followers 0 popularity
following 1

following  view all

newtf6303 is not in any groups

why i hate legal services

Aug 13th 2019 at 7:57 AM

As I've researched this story from the tangled, deceitful, web-like lines of entrapment, which appear to have entangled the lives of quite a few Bakersfield and Fresno area residents; I think I have found the spider in the center on this web. There has been much talk inside the news lately of "liberal judges," "Activist Judges," "Extremist Judges" and "Partisan Judges." Yet one sort of judge, which is not being spoken about, may be the old-fashioned "Corrupt Judge." To me it is the corrupt judge, the individual that works best for bribes, for favors, or who hands out bribes and favors to others, that is certainly with the rotten core of the items is wrong with this country's legal system. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, I think, qualifies of one from the great corrupt judges in our time!

Why do I believe? The IRS case against Dr. Steven V. Booth alone has shown how corrupt this judge Lawrence J. O'Neil is. He started by signing a vague and suspect search warrant for that IRS. The warrant ended up being search the premises of Dr. Booth and another defendant; it had been so vague which it was a reason to easily ransack the citizen's homes. The homes were ransacked, money as well as the personal property went missing and the co-defendants' lawyers called them on it. Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil was only a magistrate. You see magistrate judges have only statutory authority if someone challenges their business, which someone did, they've got no authority to make a decision their case, instead, it needs to be heard by an Article Three Federal Judge. Lawrence J. O'Neil was not legally designed to rule on whether his or her own signed warrant was valid after it absolutely was questioned. He should have rescued himself. Instead, he buried the case until he was catapulted from being a magistrate to as being a fully-fledged Federal Judge after being nominated by President G.W. Bush in 2007. Oddly, the case involving his signing of a disputed search warrant as being a magistrate now came under his jurisdiction! O'Neil must have recused himself if so also. This is what he did wrong, he ruled on his search warrant as to if it was valid or invalid just as the IRS was making their criminal case against Dr. Booth and the co-defendant. Evidence was then submitted from the IRS which should never have been allowed. Talk about letting the fox guard the henhouse!

Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil then took to get one of the most arrogant, heartless and cruel judges on the Federal Court dais. He continually passed down severe, almost medieval sentences. He quashed bills about cutting California carbon emissions in favor of the Big Oil companies. He was said by his colleagues to get an extremist judge. Yet, what he said and did to Dr. Booth's co-defendant was indeed a criminal offence bred out of corruption. Judge Lawrence was washing the backs of the IRS when they washed his. The co-defendant appeared aware by several friends and attorneys that there would have been a cabal of judges and lawyers in Fresno that had basically staked claims on the Federal Courts. Anyone crossing this gang of corrupt personages was certain to feel their wrath. In his case, each time the co-defendant attemptedto create a motion to save lots of himself, Lawrence O'Neil quashed it. He wouldn't normally reverse his decision about the search warrant, allowing evidence to be exposed to the truth which was nothing but circumstantial. "Right to some speedy trial" for your co-defendant? Denied! Then, mixing the trial of Booth using the co-defendant just as if that they been some form of criminal cohorts, O'Neil allowed Booth's perjured testimony to get seen as "proof" how the co-defendant had bilked the government from millions of dollars! Calling Booth's trust manager a "slick, cagey, wily con-man who was just upset over getting caught, rather than having committed a crime" he sentenced him to 9 long years in Federal prison, while using the IRS "$4,000,000.00 estimate" of the Booth owed them, being a basis for that harsh sentencing! Even though he knew full-well that Booth only owed $207,000, knowning that his tax burden had absolutely nothing to do with his co-defendant's case.

However, it gets worse. For the co-defendant, himself reported in my experience an attorney for the court was ushered into his cell, (not into an anteroom or meeting room and other area where most such conversations take place in prison, but right in the defendant's cell, as though he were some type of Death Row inmate). There he was offered an offer. It seems that Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil would not think he was guilty of conning government entities. Instead, he was angry as hell he wouldn't deed over the properties in their portfolio returning to Booth. So now, O'Neil was cutting an arrangement with respect to Booth along with the IRS! If the co-defendant would simply turn over his 5% portion in the properties, and convince the corporation he worked for to present over their 95%, he would be released. Case closed. Records expunged.

Now this man faced a real dilemma. Either make a move patently wrong since the IRS had convinced a jury that various trusts involved were "shams," although be signing documents having said that this is correct and true, which he was obviously a criminal and his awesome life's work a sham. He will be relinquishing properties, which are legally bought and taken care of and mostly inside the hands of your corporation he worked for, that could be also seen being disreputable if he did as Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil demanded. He would then have to attempt to convince his partners to accomplish likewise. Then he would be freed. Or, he could decline and spend 20 years in prison. He was put between your veritable rock and a hard place. His wife needed him out and dealing. His associates needed him to become out, rather than that, his reputation re-established. His kids needed him. His community needed him. He is in jail and in need of freedom. Yet if he did what Lawrence J. O'Neil asked, he would be denying every principle he ever stood for or supported.

After a good night of prayer, he gave his answer to his wife and his awesome attorney and Lawrence J. O'Neil. "No deal." This man had chosen prison over lying and wrongdoing. He may not give on the properties towards the IRS. Instead, although fight them. Now you let me know, what con-man, with a deal like that, which could free him to carry out his daily confidence games, would NOT have taken the offer? Only a good man would say "I'm remaining in jail!" In the end, Judge Lawrence O'Neil's evil plan failed to work. This is only as they was facing down a significant man; somebody that would not roll over and play his games.

The co-defendant within the Booth criminal case was finally released on appeal. He remains under house arrest, can not work, to make a living, to travel or perhaps to walk on the local store. He wears a Federally mandated ankle alarm bracelet, which the Feds want him to fund even though they have got disallowed him the legal right to work! They still work their evil machinations from this man who stood up to them and on the vile Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil, who sentences men to 750 years in prison and does not care if his children choke about the noxious polluted air of California, providing that his Big Oil bedfellows are content.

Having heard all of this I realized, Judge Lawrence J. O'Neil will be the wily, cagey con-artist here. He's the fat spider spinning the net to entrap and entangle innocent people. He does it for power and favor and funds. He's the ringleader in the Fresno/IRS gang, chasing after chiropractors and business managers as an alternative to drug lords and crime king-pins. This man needs to become exposed. He's not fit being a judge. And he needs to get inside a cell somewhere contemplating his failings, rather than lording it over others.

Please to comment

sign in

Remember Me

New to IM faceplate? join free!

Lost Password? click here